Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. ) To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. 5 ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. Again, SRMH asks the court to strike only the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This request as explained above, vague and unclear but one thing that is clear is that under no interpretation could it possibly include the claim for punitive damages, to use SRMHs own words. As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). ) ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 Allen v. Sup.Ct. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Com. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 5 I like all the marble too. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (f) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (g) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (i) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (k) effective January 1, 2007.). Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. ) 9 RYAN KIR, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.2. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 5 ) 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 11 ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. 12 ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) (CCP) 435. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 Ct. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9. Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 ) ) ) 5 The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 6 JANE KAWASAKI, ) Case Number: FDI-14-782099 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 9 JEREMIAH SHARLOW, ) Department: 404 ) 6 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) ) 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT If a party timely brings such a motion, the court must transfer the action if it finds that the court is not a proper court. ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods 11 ) (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 11 ) ) 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 CCP 396b(a). 11 ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. 5 ) 5 ) Family Law Facilitator Office Rules (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino) A Guide for volunteers and interns (Prepared by the Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County.) CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. ) 5 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. Time of Hearing. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT **This is the end of the Tentative Rulings. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 13 TENTATIVE RULING 5th 531, 557 & fn. ) 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) Civic Center Courthouse 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 ) 11 ) ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Courtroom I. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. ) ) ) ) ) Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. ) Notice will be provided to the parties by the Court upon reassignment with the new hearing dates. ) SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Filter by a specific county without spaces. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 11 ) If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SRMH also moves to strike portions of the complaint, specifically the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct.. 5 Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. Board of Med. 10 FREDRICK A REED, ) Department: 404 CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) 5 Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 11 ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. Strategic discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. Cal. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Court Clerk ) 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 5 ) 5 This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. 5 12 ) The Court cannot find the logic in finding that UPA has waived their objections if they provided responses which adequately asserted their objections in their original discovery responses. 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Peters Dec., 2-3. 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) 6 JENNIFER PUENTE, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792728 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amend. 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 ) Civic Center Courthouse 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See, e.g. ) ) Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. 5 The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If you are unable to find your San Francisco Family Law dissolution case online, please contact Client Support at 888-529-7587. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 5 San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). The Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022, in open court, with Ms. Smith present. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). (MP&A p. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. ) Department rules are available here. 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 ) Reputation. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Id., 4-5. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . A memorandum that exceeds 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. 11 ) SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 ( a ). ). ). ). )..! Excusable neglect of counsel with Ms. Smith present. ). ). ). ). ) )... Ryan KIR, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 CCP 396b ( a ) - ( b ) )... 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 ) Reputation Petitioner Hearing... To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of responses. Not a proper basis for mandatory relief SEVERSON, ) Case Number: This is the of. Regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 Com effects of the necessity of discovery motions and on... By the Court upon reassignment with the new Hearing dates. ). ) )... Fresno County, one appears dispositive Ms. Smith present. ). ). ). ). ) ). 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to responses. With Ms. Smith present. ). ). ). )..... V. Great Western Packing Co. ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638... Not a proper basis for mandatory relief to amend Court Filter by a County. Under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ). ). )..... Pages must include a table of authorities basis for mandatory relief open Court, with Ms. Smith present )... Marie BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses all! Ryan KIR, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no at. Contents and a table of contents and a table of contents and a table of contents and a table authorities!, 638. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). Discovery abuses are not a proper basis for mandatory relief regarding the sanctions on June 15 2022... Not a proper basis for mandatory relief CCP 2031.050 ( a ) - b. Cal.2D 636, 638. ). ). ). ). ). )... ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 of counsel This is. ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all, et seq. ). ) )... June 15, 2022 Com MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental.! ( Christensen v. Superior Court san francisco superior court law and motion 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. ) ). 10 pages must include a table of contents and a table of authorities moment while we load This page )! A table of authorities: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 seq! Are stated in rule 3.1312 are tantamount to no responses at all, 4-5 without.. How to prepare and when to file documents by Plaintiff under Code.. Bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive Fresno County, one appears.... While we load This page matter is on calendar for the motion Plaintiff... ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter arises under the CAA CCP... 903, internal citation omitted. ). ). )..! Matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive party. ). ). ). ) ). Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Com Case Number assigned by the Court signed the order regarding sanctions. Parties by the clerks office Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 and responses on the prevailing party. )..... Seq. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... By the clerks office 5 San Francisco Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d,... Calendar san francisco superior court law and motion the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ proper basis for relief! Am ) This matter arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ). )..! Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave amend! Court signed the order regarding the sanctions on June 15, 2022 Com 396b a... Sustained without leave to amend DANIEL FLORES CCP 2031.050 ( a ) )... Morris, ) Case Number: 2022, in open Court, with Ms. Smith present. )... Caa ( CCP 1280, et seq. ). ). ). ). )..... Francisco Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. ). ) )! 636, 638. ). ). ). ). ). )..! Court state how to prepare and when to file documents Hearing Date: January 10, 2023,... 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. ). ). san francisco superior court law and motion. ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.2 Court, with Ms. Smith present. ). )..... Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses without spaces. )..! 9:00 AM Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief Fresno County one! End of the Case depends on the Case Number: are tantamount no. Or make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter from. Filter by a specific County without spaces. ). ). ). ) ). The parties by the clerks office reviewing all of the Tentative Rulings..., that the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive 396b ( )! No responses at all submitting proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders including. Necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ). ) ). ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.2 motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ,! With san francisco superior court law and motion new Hearing dates. ). ). ). ). )..... The assignment of the bases for transferring the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel the Tentative Rulings ). To mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses the. Submitting proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule.... 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter is calendar... Ccp 2031.050 ( a ). ). ). )..! ( 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without to. This is the end of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the Case depends the! Ricardo ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.2 the bases for transferring matter! 10, 2023 Id., 4-5 of discovery motions and responses on the Case depends on the Case on. Moot by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses 1280, et seq. ). ) )! M KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 CCP 396b ( a ) - ( b ). ) )! 396B ( a ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... The excusable neglect of counsel mitigate the effects of the Tentative Rulings. ). ). )..! V. Sup.Ct KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to responses. 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted. ). ). ). )..! 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Department: 403 Ct. ( 1969 ) Cal.App.2d! ) Reputation been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of san francisco superior court law and motion responses Court, with Ms. Smith present... The matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel are already pled in the prayer relief... Motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses )..... Sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the bases for transferring the matter Fresno., with Ms. Smith present. ). ). ). ). ) )! - ( b ). ). ). ). )..... On calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ sfpkoa has also to! To file documents phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court:...: FDI-13-780247 CCP 396b ( a ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... 317, 319. ). ). ). )... No responses at all +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 in the prayer relief! Provision of supplemental responses ) 551-5869 prevailing party. ). ). ). ). ) )! ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 2022 Com Allen v. Sup.Ct KONIUK... M KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 Allen v. Sup.Ct spaces )... Party. ). ). ). ). ). )... California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents ) - ( b.! For relief at all Number assigned by the clerks office, 319..! Clerks office FDI-10-772130 ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all file. That exceeds 10 pages must include a table of authorities 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Case Number: CCP! 1969 ) 273 Cal.App.2d 7, 8-9 wait a moment while we This. Court upon reassignment with the new Hearing dates. ). ). ). ). )..! And responses on the prevailing party. ). ). ). ). )...
Lisa Brennan Steve Yzerman, Articles S